Attention Spans Are Longer Online

Monday, April 16, 2007 15:17

A recent study conducted by the Poytner Institute found that people who read the news online have a greater attention span than those who read the news in the traditional paper-based format. Why exactly are people more apt to read all of the text on a newspaper’s website as opposed to the paper version? Is it because the text is easier to read online (i.e. larger fonts)? Maybe the web version is simply more appealing with its color scheme and page layout? Or is it due to the fact that when reading a webpage, a smaller portion of the article is displayed because of the size of the window and screen?

“The study also found that people paid more attention to items written in a question and answer format or as lists, and preferred documentary news photographs to staged or studio pictures” (Goldsmith, 2007). I think this may be the key. In recent years, it has become more favorable to present more information in simple formats. By writing news stories in formats different from the traditional narrative, the story becomes more like a conversation. The question and answer format is a perfect example of this. The interviewer asks the questions and the interviewee answers them. I prefer stories written in this format because it cuts out the extra gunk of transitional phrases and fluff. I will remember more from an article where I feel like I am sitting in on a conversation between two or three people than I will if that conversation is written in narrative form. Another reason I like the question and answer format is because I can read the questions first and then decide if I want to read the response. It’s a quicker way for me to read the information that I want. It’s essentially an expanded form of a bulleted list.

As information becomes available in more ways it is going to be increasingly important that messages be sent quickly and efficiently. I like to think of it as “less is more.” The web has accelerated the rate at which we receive and absorb information. Personally, I want to be able quickly scan an article or story and judge whether or not its worth my time to read.

Source: Mediapost

http://geoff-caplan.com, email geoffcaplan@mac.com

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
Share and Enjoy:
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
Share This Post

Related posts:

  1. Top Newspapers Online Nielsen’s Top 10 online newspapers in terms of traffic:1. NYTimes.com...
  2. Blu-ray: Not Succeeding? Listen to this article More than six months after HD-DVD...
  3. Results of Recent Market Survey: Use of Online Video (From knowledgestorm.com) Sixty-three percent of the survey respondents access online...
  4. Writers: We Will Move Online The Hollywood union strike between the Writers Guild of America...
  5. Willful Online Exploitation? Online video startup Metacafe is attempting to bring a little...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.