Marketing and Technology News

[Search engine optimization expert Jill Whalen started answering this question in her newsletter with the usual answer, but as she looked at the site in question, she realized there was more going on than
meets the eye. Please read through the entire question and her response to see what Jill means!]

Dear Jill,

We recently released our new website in Feb. and prior to release we held
the number 1 position on Google for [our main keyword phrase] and the number 3 slot and number 2 spots for [additional keyword phrases].

Within days of our release our rankings fell through the roof as did the number of quality Google leads that were coming through our doors. We seem to still be holding up well on the other sites but still not like we did before. We have an SEO firm working with us and we have been with them for 4 years. At this time I am starting to wonder why we continue to fall and what
we/they are not doing right. Is it normal to fall like this after the launch of a new site? They told us it would be a week or 2 and now we are on month 2.

Thanks for your time.

Best regards,

John

++Jill’s Response++

Hi John,

This is common with redesigns when you switch content management systems or otherwise change your URLs. You will often have to wait for some period for the search engines to remove your old URLs and index the new ones. Plus, they sometimes give less weight to new URLs that have no history (or previous link popularity).

However, then I took a quick glance at the site and noticed some disturbing things. I thought it would be a good idea to discuss them here so that others could learn what *not* to do on their own sites, especially as it seems to have had such a dramatically negative impact on the business.

The home page looked nice and professional at first glance; however, near the bottom of the page was a scrolling window with a ton of keyword-rich copy contained in it. Scrolling through that window revealed a ton of keyword-rich text links. Neither of these things are necessarily search engine spam in and of themselves, but because of the way they were integrated into the website, they certainly set off alarm bells in my head. Companies don’t bury great marketing copy that will help sell their products or services. They do that only when they don’t understand how to write for their users and search engines alike.

Even though this copy was technically visible (one could scroll the inner window and read it all) the search engines may very well consider it hidden text.

A quick peek at some of the pages in the “hidden” links revealed more problems for this site. The links were pointing to a slew of old-fashioned doorway pages, the likes of which I hadn’t seen since the 1990s! Sure, they were a bit more sophisticated than the old 90s versions, as they were integrated into the site template. They could even be mistaken for real site pages when viewed individually; however, it was pretty much just “madlib spam.” In other words, all 20 or so pages said the same thing, only they switched out keyword phrases for other keyword phrases. They were poorly written and oftentimes simply gibberish.

[huge sigh]

It’s scary to know that there are still SEO companies out there creating this kind of junk. John declined to tell me who his SEO company is, so I don’t know if it’s a well-known firm or not. I don’t know what he paid for the pleasure of spamming the search engines either, but I hope it wasn’t much. He also just told me that due to their lack of a search engine
presence in Google for the past few months, they’ve just had to lay someone off. Now, I don’t believe in relying on search engine rankings in order to successfully run your business, but when you think of the horrible impact a bad SEO company can have on a business, it’s frightening. I’m quite sure that one day in the not-too-distant future there will be lawsuits based on
this kind of bad SEO. That won’t be good for any of us in the SEO industry.

John’s CEO is now aware of the problem and they’re cleaning up the mess. I suggested that he file a Google reinclusion request once they have removed the spam.

If anyone reading this provides this sort of SEO spam to clients, you really should be ashamed of yourself. If you work for a company that offers this type of shoddy work and didn’t know that it was spam, you may want to voice your concerns to the folks in charge (and/or find a new job). Being responsible for a company’s loss of business would not be a good feeling at all.

Share your comments and thoughts here:
<http://www.highrankings.com/advisor/lost-rankings-spam/>

(P.S. If anyone would like to republish the above Q&A article, please email Jill with your request and where it will reside, and she will send you a short bio you can use with it for your site.)

CEO and founder of High Rankings®, Jill Whalen has been performing search engine optimization since 1995 and is the host of the free High Rankings Advisor search engine marketing newsletter, author of “The Nitty-gritty of Writing for the Search Engines” and founder/administrator of the popular High Rankings Search Engine Optimization Forum. In 2006, Jill co-founded SEMNE, a local search engine marketing networking organization for people and companies in New England.

Related posts:

1. Web Site Promotion Do’s and Don’ts DON’T ever include a keyword or key phrase in your...
2. Links to Success Did you know that web linkage is responsible for a...
3. Apple.Com Doesn’t Care About Google Rank? Google states that they are getting more aggressive in how...
4. Frequently Asked Questions in Search Engine Marketing What is the difference between a Search Engine and a...
5. Why Links Matter I’ll explain how search engines use links to determine the...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.